Tuesday, July 13, 2010

The Healthy Food debate

You know, as much as I want to support the removal of GST from 'healty foods' the more I seem to understand that it is a logistical nightmare.

Firstly. What defines healthy foods? As has been seen recently, McDonalds has introduced a range of foods that are healthier than their normal range, but they in themselves can be unhealthy. For example, from their healthy choice menu you can have 6 chicken McNuggets, (deep fried) and a side salad and water (or presumably a Diet/Coke Zero or Sprite). But at what point does eating chicken nuggets with their side sauce become unhealthy. Does 7 nuggets make it unhealthy?

Fruit itself can be unhealthy. The amount of sugar (albeit natural) in Oranges and other sweet fruit items can add to the problem, rather than prevent the issue, as it is the sugars that cause part of the problems.

If GST is removed off fruit for example, an obviously healthy choice, but say I add that fruit to Ice Cream (diet or not it doesn't matter, ice cream is ice cream), does it then become unhealthy? Green Bananas - Healthy. Green Bananas with Coconut cream? Ripe Bananas - Healthy. Ripe Banana's battered and deep fried or baked into a cheesecake or banana cake with cream cheese icing?

Apples off the tree for a snack is healthy, but the same apples baked into an apple pie or strawberries turned into jam. Everything that is healthy can be turned on its ear and into something unhealthy.

I would love to support the remove of GST off of healthy foods but that in itself is only part of the issue.

Access to physical activity is another. I would love to join a gym but the average cost is at minimum $15 a week, but even then it is more than if I pay out one lump sum. One local gym price for a one year membership is $675 for a one year membership. However there is a $15 a week direct debit option which would equate to almost $100 a year. Single entry is $12.50. There is also the desire that needs to be there for physical activity to be effective. So that also needs to step up as well.

Knowledge is also another weapon. The thing about fresh food, fruit and veges is being able to do things with them that don't remove the health benefits of eating them. You can cook a cabbage in a way that doesn't destroy the health benefits of it. Making a nice warm winter soup without boiling the nutritional value of the foods you use. Making a healthy pumpkin soup without the need for half a litre of cream to ruin it.

Its the latter idea that I think the government has lost the plot on scrapping the community education funding. Cooking classes for low budget meals. The sad irony is that the other night, a meal was cooked in our home. We did the general maths and came out to the cost of the meal being at something like $20-25. The thing about it is that the overall output of the meal could have fed twice what the number said it would. The other sad irony is, I could have gone to a local fish and chip store and spent $10 and got meal that while filling, would not have been healthy.

There is one possible avenue were I see scrapping the the GST off of fruit and veg may be manageable, and may benefit directly those whom this is being targeted. Some way the shops may be able to deduct the tax off of the purchase when a valid community services card or Gold card. Nothing new needs to be printed as cards already exist, and only a minor software change need be applied. Yes, the government will lose revenue and of course it will be gained from elsewhere which always creates problems.

The thing is, tax cuts or not, people are struggling. Its cheaper to buy a 2.25 litre of coke than it is to buy 2 litres of milk. Its generally cheaper to buy a dinner pack at KFC or a pack of fish and chips than it is to feed your family a nutritious meal every night. We impose levies and taxes on smokes and booze but when it comes to take something away that will make financial restrictions on something that is good for us...we hold fire faster than The Flash making logistical excuses.

There is surely something that can be done and it has to be done to address the financial imbalance that exists.

Labels: ,

Monday, July 12, 2010

Peter Bethune

How many kinds of idiot can you be in one hit. Pete Bethune seems be an all-in-one Dumbass.

1 - You deliberately drive a carbon fibre boat in the path of a solid steel whaler and wonder who was going to come off best.
2 - You board the ship that hit the boat in international waters, trying to make a citizens arrest, for which you had to right to do in the first place.
3 - You then turn to the New Zealand people for support, when its your own dumbass fault in the first place
4 - After being released from a potentially hard labour prison sentence then blow your nut off at the government for in your mind, not doing enough to support you.
5 - After all of that, do not seem to get still, you put yourself there, in harms way, and essentially gave yourself over to the Japanese government in the first place.

I'm no whaling supporter. I don't like what they are doing in the first place and do not support it. But there are two things I am not going to do.
1. If I had the money, I certainly would not be driving my expensive boat in the path of a whaler.
2. Be donating money to a cause or an organisation who endorses actions like that, putting human lives at risk.

I personally hope that Sea Shepherd's ban is not what he thinks in terms of being a ploy to broker a deal. I really hope they ban his ass and that he fully realises he stuffed up and turned a respectable organisation into what seems to be a suicidal bunch of idiots who will kill themselves to save a humpback.

Not that it is the same mentality, but a long time ago the Japanese proved when they were committed to a cause they were prepared to die. If you need examples, think back to World War 2. But everything that Mr Bethune got, he deserved.

Lets say I go overseas and I deliberately import banned substances. I should expect the full extent of criminal law to be measured to me. Sure, I may look to my government for help, but I should also know, that if i break the law, its my own dumb fault.

This section is taken from the NZ Herald online and sums up essentially my feelings.

"I think he's downright ungrateful. The people in Japan did everything they possibly could," Mr Key told reporters in Vietnam."I've seen a list of the engagement they had with him. It was very extensive.

"They did everything they possibly could and I stand by the actions of our people in Japan, who worked extremely hard to help him through a very difficult process."

Mr Bethune should remember that he got himself into the situation, Mr Key said.

"He had a letter that said 'I do not want to be taken off the boat under any circumstances and I do want to be taken to Japan' and he was.

"We gave him all the support that we possibly could and, in the end, he's had a sentence that has allowed him to return to New Zealand but to somehow lash out and blame our people in Japan under the leadership of our ambassador there, Ian Kennedy, who has done a tremendous job for him, I think it's just ungrateful."

Mr Bethune today claimed his trial had been a miscarriage of justice because the Japanese whalers did not face charges for sinking his $3 million ship, the Ady Gil.